Upon asking a teacher friend of mine why she voted for McCain after voting for Obama in the primary, and even volunteering on behalf of his campaign, she said the following: I didn’t know he was a socialist.
I simultaneously vomited, became enraged, and laughed.
Now, you’re free to vote for whomever you’d like. If she had valid reasons (not to me, but valid in at least some universe) I’d have been content to let her vote away. I could even let this go seeing as how her vote didn’t affect the outcome, but that wouldn’t be very inciteful, would it?
She latched onto a familiar phrase, the “redistribute the wealth” line that was made the anti-obama slogan nearing the end. After attempting to convince my mother otherwise of the academic sense in which Obama used those words, I just gave up and asked her what else. Color me surprised when I discovered Katie Couric ran Obama’s campaign.
What I found most disappointing is the effectiveness of negative ads on voters. I could wrap myself up in warm, billowy confidence that it only worked on uneducated voters. But it worked on her, and she is definitely educated. Can I convince myself that maybe she simply didn’t invest the time in finding out the facts? Even if that were true, wouldn’t common sense dictate that, if indeed he was a socialist, we would have heard about this long before he as debating for the presidency of the United States of America?
Other’s I know voted McCain because they earn over 250,000 a year. I guess I cannot argue with that. If enough people did that, and voted similarly, everything would work out.
Aside from that, I had some interesting conversations with friends about abortion recently. I won’t get into the specifics of the argument both for and against, but i’ll simply state an opinion I hold on our government and rights:
The constitution and legal framework that exists in America is exactly that, a framework for our society. I believe it to be the best available, and one that I believe in with all of my heart. With that being said, there are certainly instances and cases in which laws should be created- laws to safeguard things that could not possibly be known at the time our country united.
However, legislating decisions and choice for people is a band-aid for any problem for which the law is being made. In the case of abortion, teens will still become pregnant and abortions will happen. I will agree, fundamentally, that making it illegal will make it less likely to be done, but I will not agree that unprepared (meaning could result in unwanted pregnancy) sex will be reduced.
I will not debate when the moment of life happens. It’s too difficult a topic for me to think about and understand fully. There is no concrete answer to it.
What I do know, and feel most strongly about, is the fact we can educate people to know and understand the weight of the decisions they are making. The consequences, emotions, and turmoil that they might go through if two people choose to have sex when they are unprepared to raise a child. And after all of that, the pain, the emotions, the sleepless nights- if you still think that the choice of abortion is for you, then by what right does the government have to say no to that? Can you legislate against rational, informed, intelligent decisions?
Removing decisions from people is rarely the right thing to do. We are on the brink of marriage bans for same sex couples in California, and I have yet to hear a convincing argument for it. Hell, I have yet to hear an argument that makes any semblance of sense. And while i can respect and understand the differences between same sex marriage and abortion, they are both eliminating rights based on personal views and beliefs. We can teach views, we can teach understanding, and we can teach how to weigh consequences in our decisions- what we can’t do is unwrite laws, and what some other’s cannot do is get married.
And that, to me, is one of the saddest things to see happen.